1. Amnesty International. (2019). Troll Patrol Findings.
  2. Ausserhofer, J., & Maireder, A. (2013). NATIONAL POLITICS ON TWITTER: Structures and topics of a networked public sphere. Information Communication and Society, 16(3), 291–314.
  3. Bandura, A. (1978). Social Learning Theory of Aggression. Journal of Communication.
  4. Benesch, S., Ruths, D., Dillon, K. P., Mohammad Saleem, H., Wright, L., & Ruths -, D. (2016). Considerations for Successful Counterspeech. Retrieved from
  5. Cheng, J., Bernstein, M., Danescu-Niculescu-mizil, C., & Leskovec, J. (2017). Anyone can become a troll: Causes of trolling behavior in online discussions. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW, 1217–1230.
  6. Cikara, M. (2015, June 1). Intergroup Schadenfreude: Motivating participation in collective violence. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 3, pp. 12–17.
  7. Conway, M. (2014). Ethical issues in using twitter for public health surveillance and research: Developing a taxonomy of ethical concepts from the research literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(12), 1–9.
  8. Danaher, J. (2019). The Case Against Righteous Anger. Retrieved December 9, 2019, from
  9. Mapping Media Freedom. (2019). Targeting the messenger: Journalists face an onslaught of online harassment.
  10. Mikal, J., Hurst, S., & Conway, M. (2016). Ethical issues in using Twitter for population-level depression monitoring: A qualitative study. BMC Medical Ethics, 17(1), 1–11.
  11. Muller, K., & Schwarz, C. (2017). Fanning the Flames of Hate: Social Media and Hate Crime. SSRN Electronic Journal.
  12. Munger, K. (2017). Tweetment Effects on the Tweeted: Experimentally Reducing Racist Harassment. Political Behavior, 39(3), 629–649.
  13. Newton, C. (2019). Why a top content moderation company quit the business instead of fixing its problems. Retrieved December 9, 2019, from The Verge website:
  14. Pater, J. A., Kim, M. K., Mynatt, E. D., & Fiesler, C. (2016). Characterizations of online harassment: Comparing policies across social media platforms. Proceedings of the International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, 1316November2016, 369–374.
  15. Sharma, S., & Shrivastava, M. (2018). Degree based Classification of Harmful Speech using Twitter Data. Retrieved from
  16. Srinivasan, A. (2018). The aptness of anger. Journal of Political Philosophy, 26(2), 123–144.
  17. Suler, J. (2004). The Online Disinhibition Effect. In CYBERPSYCHOLOGY & BEHAVIOR (Vol. 7).
  18. Tirrell, L. (2019). Toxic misogyny and the limits of counterspeech. Fordham Law Review.
  19. Twitter. (2019). Twitter Rules and Policies. Retrieved December 9, 2019, from